After
World War II, Western Europe experienced one of the most remarkable recoveries
in modern history, often referred to as a “Golden Age”. Rapid economic growth
and social progress helped mitigate the devastation of war within a relatively
short period. Among the key drivers of this recovery were population growth and
mass migration, as labor shortages were addressed by recruiting workers from
former colonies to help rebuild war-torn economies. This article discusses the
role of colonialism and migration in Britain’s post-war recovery and reflects
on how their legacies continue to shape British society today.
Migration
in Post-War Britain
After
World War II, labor shortages in key sectors such as transport, healthcare,
manufacturing, and construction prompted the British government to turn to its
colonies to rebuild infrastructure and maintain essential services. Caribbean
migrants—from Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago—were recruited to staff public
transport systems and the newly established National Health Service. South
Asians migrants—primarily from India, Pakistan, and later
Bangladesh—significantly contributed to the textile industry, steel production,
and various public service roles. In smaller numbers, African workers from
Nigeria, Ghana, and Kenya, among others, were recruited for dock work, road
building, and urban construction projects.
Prior
to the postwar migration wave, Britain had already relied heavily on its
colonies to support both World Wars. During World War II, colonial mobilization
reached unprecedented levels, with over five million troops recruited from
across the British Empire—including India, Africa, the Caribbean, and Southeast
Asia. Unlike the known contributions of male soldiers, the vital roles played
by colonial women in non-combatant capacities—such as in auxiliary services,
nursing units, and munitions factories—remain largely undocumented and
marginalized in official narratives.
"These migration patterns, rooted in Britain’s colonial history, played a crucial role in rebuilding the nation and continue to shape British society today.
After
the war, many of these servicemen and women remained in Britain, contributing
to postwar reconstruction. Between the late 1940s and the early 1970s an
estimated 500,000 immigrants lived in Britain. A significant proportion were
women who worked in health services, textile and electronic industries, and
domestic service and childcare—often as voluntary and informal labor as they lack legal access to formal employment.
These migration patterns, rooted in Britain’s colonial history, played a
crucial role in rebuilding the nation and continue to shape British society
today.
Global
Economic Dominance
Britain
is widely recognized for its economic transformations and social progress
throughout history, most notably as the birthplace of the Industrial
Revolution. As the largest colonial empire of its time, Britain was also the
first nation to industrialize on a significant scale. Yet the historical
connection between colonialism and industrialization has often been downplayed
in official narratives. Recent scholarship, however, has brought this link into
sharper focus. Heblich, Redding, and Voth (2022) find that “… greater slavery
wealth promoted local economic growth and led to a reallocation of economic
activity away from agriculture, and towards manufacturing …”, suggesting “... that
slavery wealth contributed causally to Britain’s Industrial Revolution,
accelerating growth and facilitating the escape from Malthusian constraints.”
(pp. 41–2).
![]() |
India offering pearls to Britannia, the symbol of British power |
Furthermore,
British industrial expansion depended heavily on access to raw materials
sourced from its colonies, often through systems of coerced labor and
exploitative trade arrangements. This demand for resources intensified colonial
extraction and facilitated the geographic and administrative expansion of
imperial control. As production in Britain grew, so did the need for external
markets—leading to the transformation of colonies into consumers of British
manufactured goods. The profits generated through this imperial circuit were then
reinvested in the empire’s technological innovation and industrial development,
reinforcing Britain's global economic dominance (Historical Encyclopedia,
2024).
Another
pivotal transformation in British history was the Victorian Boom (1850–1873),
often regarded as a golden age of British capitalism and imperial expansion.
Marked by imperial ambitions, it was an era of rapid industrial growth,
dominance in global trade, and economic prosperity.
Colonialism
and Migration
As we
can see, Britian’s history of migration is inseparable from its colonial past, but
more broadly, form the legacy of European colonialism. During the imperial era,
regions of the world were carved up by European powers, while ignoring existing
geopolitical, ethnic, and cultural realities. Territories were distributed
among European colonial powers of the time—later reallocated among them—to suit
changing political interests. Agreements took place between European
counterparts and other regions without much participation of the latter,
setting the course for future conflicts. The Sky-Picot agreement (1916) and
Balfour Declaration (1917) are examples of what would lay the groundwork for
future disputes in the Middle East. Arbitrary borders drawn across the African
continent and their subsequent reconfiguration after World War I all
contributed to enduring conflicts, wars, and migration challenges that Europe
continues to face today.
"During the imperial era, regions of the world were carved up by European powers, while ignoring existing geopolitical, ethnic, and cultural realities.
In terms of social hierarchy, post-World War II migration to Britain mirrored the hierarchal relationship between colonizer and their colonies. Migrants from former colonies faced discrimination and structural barriers. In the 1960s, amidst the rise of civil rights movement across the West, the British government adopted a racial equality framework and embraced a multicultural approach. By the 1990s, policy discourse shifted toward an integration model, but immigrant women continued to face exclusion from formal employment. This model was introduced in response to an increasing migration flow that raised concern over cohesion and national identity.
Integration
policies emphasized national identity, security, and social cohesion. However,
underfunding, poor interagency coordination, and a narrow focus on language and
civic tests hinder the successful implementation of integration policies.
Nevertheless, some attribute the failure of integration to migrants’ lack of
cultural compatibility, unwillingness to assimilate, and economic inactivity.
This view not only overlooks technical challenges in policy implementation but
also ignores structural barriers, such as systematic racism and patriarchal
policy frameworks, as among the underlying causes of integration failures.
“Take Back What Once Was Rightfully Yours”
For
many, migration raises emotionally charged questions of identity and
security—specifically, who belongs and who is entitled to access resources.
Throughout history, the question of entitlement often resurfaces as tensions
intensify during periods of economic downturn, when previously privileged
groups face growing competition over housing, employment, and public services.
To delegitimize these perceived deprivations, nationalist values are promoted
and gain traction, frequently fueled by populist discourses that lament the
loss of cultural identity, economic agency, and sovereignty. At its core lies
the self-righteous rhetoric “take back what once was rightfully yours.”
Recent
studies highlight the rise of populist movements in Europe and North America,
driven in large part by white working-class men who feel increasingly
marginalized by shifts in employment and labor conditions, as well as by
transformations in family life and gender politics that have reshaped the
social status of women (Turner, 2024).
![]() |
Old Father Thames, the symbol of London's power |
This
sense of marginalization aligns with what sociologists refer to as aggrieved
entitlement. This concept describes how privileged groups in multicultural
Western societies—especially white middle- and working-class men—feel that they
are losing the social dominance once ascribed to them due to changes
in the population, economy, and in the family.
Privileged groups may feel disadvantaged by changes that have redistributed
social and economic privileges they believe were exclusively enjoyed by their
families for generations.
Moreover,
shifts in gender roles have disrupted traditional masculine roles—such as those
of breadwinner, worker, and father—undermined by economic instability,
automation, and evolving cultural norms. As a result, feelings of injustice and
resentment, particularly among white working- and
middle-class men, extend beyond economic loss to
encompass cultural disempowerment and identity erosion—sentiments that, in
turn, foster ethnocentrism and misogyny.
From
Global Power to Existential Anxieties
Migration
is an intrinsic part of British history, shaped by its colonial past and the
enduring impact of unresolved conflicts in
former colonies. Although Britain has historically benefited from migrant
labor, economic downturns and demographic changes have fueled anti-migration
sentiments that often target ethno-religious migrant groups and deflect attention
from failures of the system. Nevertheless, with declining fertility rates and
an aging population, the UK increasingly relies on immigration to sustain its
working population and labor market.
"Migration is an intrinsic part of British history, shaped by its colonial past and the enduring impact of unresolved conflicts in former colonies.
Meanwhile,
emerging pronatalist discourses in UK politics—driven by concerns over cultural
decline and the shrinking labor force—echo postwar propaganda that sought to
reinforce the patriarchal nuclear family and cast reproduction as a civic duty.
While pronatalism potentially exacerbates gender inequality, it also raises
concerns about xenophobic and exclusionary policies, particularly when
demographic decline is framed as a threat to national identity. How the UK
navigates the intersecting challenges of migration, demographic shifts, and
existential anxieties remains to be seen.
Images: "The East Offering Its Riches to
Britannia" by Spiridione Roma (1778),
provided by the British Library from its digital collections. Catalogue entry:
IOSM F245, CC0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=31452944
Read my other blog for topics on history and countercultures
Sources:
Baughan, Emily (2023) 'The European Right’s
“Pro-Family” Turn Is Just Austerity in Disguise.' Jacobin.com.
https://jacobin.com/2023/08/conservative-party-uk-pronatalism-childcare-patriarchy-xenophobia
[9 October 2025].
Burton, Lucy (2025) 'Britain’s Economic Failures
Are Fuelling the Masculinity Crisis.' The Telegraph, April 14, 2025.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/04/14/britains-economic-failures-fuelling-the-masculinity-crisis/
[8 October 2025].
Fogarty, Richard and Andrew Tait Jarboe (2021)
'Non-European Soldiers.' International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/non-european-soldiers/ [30
September 2025].
Heblich, Stephan, Stephen J. Redding, and
Hans-Joachim Voth (2022) 'Slavery and the British Industrial Revolution.' The
Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper No. 1884 November 2022, pp.
41-42. https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1884.pdf [28 September 2025].
Historical Encyclopedia (2024) ‘Industrial
Revolution and Colonial Era in Great Britain.’ https://globhistory.org/en/article/velikobritaniya_angliya,_shotlandiya/industrialnaya_revolyuciya_i_kolonialnaya_epoha_v_velikobritanii
[28 September 2025].
Kaya, Ayhan (2025) 'The instrumentalisation of Migration
in the Populist Era.' Mixed Migration Centre. https://mixedmigration.org/the-instrumentalisation-of-migration-in-the-populist-era/
[29 September 2025].
Population Matters (2023) 'Pronatalism in the
UK.' Population Matters.
https://populationmatters.org/news/2023/05/pronatalism-in-the-uk/ [9 October
2025].
Striking Women (n.d.) 'Women and Work Post
World War II: 1946–1970.' Striking Women. https://www.striking-women.org/module/women-and-work/post-world-war-ii-1946-1970
[2 October 2025].
The National Archives (n.d.) 'Bound for
Britain: Experiences of Immigration to the UK.' The National Archives.
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/bound-for-britain/ [2
October 2025].
Turner, Bryan Stanley (2024) ‘Masculinity,
Citizenship, and Demography: The Rise of Populism.’ Int J Polit Cult Soc
37, 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-023-09459-w [7 October 2025].
Vonyó, Tamás (2019) 'Recovery and Reconstruction:
Europe after WWII.' Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).
https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/recovery-and-reconstruction-europe-after-wwii
[30 September 2025].